ANTHROPOLOGY 424:
AZTECS AND THEIR PREDECESSORS
Summer 2008
WEB
|
Description | Objectives | Goals | Required Readings | Course Requirements & Grading | Class Schedule | Additional Readings | Download Syllabus |
|
Instructor: Dr. Carl Wendt Office: MH-426H Office Phone: 714-278-5764 Sch. #: 11232 |
E-mail: cwendt@fullerton.edu Office Hours: I am teaching this course from the field (Veracruz, Mexico) so I will not have in-person office hours. I will respond to your emails within 48 hours. |
COURSE DESCRIPTION FROM THE CATALOG
Prerequisite: Anthro 102, 103. Archaeological survey of principal Mesoamerica pre-Columbian cultures north and west of the Maya area. The Aztecs and their predecessors, religion, art, architecture, intellectual achievements and the Olmec heritage.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
This course is a detailed survey of Mexican archaeology and prehistory. It will begin with the earliest evidence for human occupation in Mexico and continue through the decline of the Aztec civilization. The focus of the course is on non-Maya Mexico, i.e., the area north/west of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. After several introductory lectures, the class will cover the significant cultural developments, prominent cultures, and major sites over the centuries (e.g., early hunter-gatherers, the Archaic period and the beginnings of agriculture, settled villages and the rise of social complexity, and the development of urban civilization [see Class Schedule below]). The format will be a combination of PowerPoint-illustrated lectures, weekly readings, and video clips of the week's major topic(s).
Anth. 424 is taught primarily for advanced undergraduate and graduate students, and the coverage of materials will be intensive and detailed. We will deal with information from excavations and the artifact data underlying current interpretations, and we will also consider what those data can tell us about the societies and people who inhabited various regions of prehistoric Mexico. The course requires you learn about both the basic archaeology of the area (chronologies, site and phase names, some significant pottery types, etc.) and about the societies themselves. Anth. 423, a separate course taught in the fall semester, covers the Maya of southeastern Mesoamerica.
Mexican prehistory is not an “absolute,” already understood and simply waiting there for you to memorize. Our knowledge depends upon archaeology, and in spite of nearly a century of fieldwork, only a very small sample of Mexico’s past has been recovered. Present interpretations are based upon that small sample, and each new archaeological project provides fresh information. Therefore, our understanding of Mexican prehistory is always in a state of change, constantly in need of up-dating. Because our knowledge of Mexican prehistory is based primarily on the interpretations made of the artifacts and patters uncovered by archaeological fieldwork, it is also captive to the quality of those interpretations. Interpretations are not always completely free of biases, and they can be influenced by many factors far removed from basic archaeology. Thus, throughout the semester I will continually challenge you to think critically about the data and interpretations being presented in the lectures, and those which underline the “definitive” statements in your textbook (and elsewhere) about particular time periods, sites, societies, “events,” “influences,” and Mesoamerican prehistory in general. An important component in this course is critical thinking!
Online lectures and the text are the primary source of information and data in this course (note: I will occasionally disagree with the textbook and the web is full of misinformation!). Although your textbook is new and up-to-date, no textbook can adequately cover all topics nor keep up with all the new data or changing ideas. Also, every text is influenced to some extent by the viewpoint of the author. Use your textbook as a source of general information to assist you in understanding chronologies and general developments, and for basic information on particular sites. I also require a number of supplementary readings to enrich and expand the information available to you. The online lectures and supplementary readings will frequently up-date information from the text.
STUDENT LEARNING GOALS
Upon successful completion of Anthropology 424, students will have acquired the following knowledge as part of the learning goals and objectives of the course.
1. Attaining advanced knowledge in archaeology
2. Gaining familiarity with the cultures of a major world region (Western Mesoamerica)
3. Applying methods specific to an anthropological sub-field – understanding how archaeological knowledge is constructed using material remains to infer past behaviors and to reconstruct past lifeways
4. Describe and explain the diversity of opinion apparent in a contemporary archaeological controversy
5. Describe the ways in which specific Mesoamerican cultures adapted to their local environments
6. Detect and describe the key features of any Mesoamerican culture that set it apart as a distinct culture
7. Describe the ecological diversity over time and space of Mesoamerican Indian cultures
8. Communicating effectively in written and oral forms
9. Conducting library research using modern methods
10. Using a computer for research and writing
11. Thinking critically and creatively about issues requiring a synthesis of perspectives from the humanities and the social sciences
12. Understanding processes of cultural change in a range of human societies by examining long-term processes and using multi-causal models
REQUIRED READINGS
Evans, Susan Toby
2008 Ancient Mexico and Central America: Archaeology and Culture History, Thames & Hudson, London. (ISBN: 978-0-500-28714-9)
There will also be required supplementary readings (REQ) assigned each week, as well as a number of optional readings for undergraduates (SR and GS, see below), some of which are required for grad students enrolled in the Anthropology MA program (see symbols below). All readings will be available on the course Blackboard site for students to download and read.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND GRADING POLICY FOR THE COURSE
The grading in this course will be based on 3 exams, 5 quizzes, and 4 projects (and a term paper for students taking the course for graduate credit). Students who use this 400-level course for their Anthropology graduate study plan are required to present more detailed knowledge, skills, and research than upper division students. Additional requirements for students seeking graduate course credit are: the successful completion of a research paper.
Successful progress in the course requires that students keep up with the assigned material. This is an online course and has no scheduled class meetings. Students will be expected to keep up to date on assignments, and will access instructional materials (supplemental readings, video clips, lectures, etc.), quizzes, and projects online. The overall structure of the course is provided in this syllabus.
Undergraduates
Sixty-five percent of your course grade will be based upon two Midterm Exams (20% each) and a Final Exam (25%). The remaining 35% will be derived from 5 weekly Quizzes and 4 Problem Write-ups (rather than a term paper).
Graduate Students
Your course grade will be based upon two Midterm Exams (15% each) and a Final Exam (20%), plus the 5 weekly Quizzes (15%), 4 Problem Write-ups (15%), and a Research Paper (20%).
Online Quizzes
There will be five (5) on-line quizzes (30 questions each). Each of these quizzes will be worth 3% of the final grade. Taking the quizzes will be a good preparation for the bigger on-line examinations. Weekly quizzes and will be posted on Monday and are due by 10pm on Saturday of that week. Once you begin the quiz, you cannot come back to it so make sure you are prepared before you start. So, attempt each Quiz only after you have completed the week’s reading, viewed the lecture, and viewed the any videos or other content. .
Problem Write-ups
During the span of the semester there will be 4 problems assigned. Together the assignments will constitute 20% of the student’s grade (15% for graduate students). The nature of each assignment will be detailed in the instructions for each problem.
Research Paper (graduate students)
Each graduate student will complete a 10-page research paper on a topic dealing with Ancient Mexico. All topics must be approved by the instructor. A preliminary statement concerning the paper topic must be submitted to me via email by July 26. A paper outline and preliminary bibliography is due by August 2 and the final paper is due on August 7. Graduate students must consult with me (via email) during the development of their topic. Please use American Antiquity / Latin American Antiquity reference format, which is explained in the October 1992 issue of American Antiquity vol. 57, pp. 749-770, and can be read on the Web at http://www.saa.org/Publications/StyleGuide/styframe.html.
Online Examinations
Three exams will be given during the semester. Exam 1 and 2 are non-cumulative. Most of the Final Exam covers material from the last 1/3 of the class, but it also covers materials from the first 2/3 of the course. Exam 1 will become available on Monday, July 14 at 8am, and remain available until Saturday, June 19 at 10pm. Exam 2 will become available on Monday, July 28 at 8am, and remain available until Saturday, August 2 at 10pm. The Final Online Exam will only be available for one day – Friday, August 8 from 8am to 10pm. You will have one hour and fifty minutes to take Exams 1 and 2, and two hours to take the Final. You must complete each exam in one sitting (i.e., you cannot come back to it), so make sure that you have a block of time when you won’t be interrupted. You will not be able to open either exam up once you have closed it.
Extra Credit
This course does not include an extra credit option.
Makeup Exams and Late Papers
You must post assignments on time. Five percent of the grade will be deducted from written assignments for each day they are late, no excuses. Makeup exams will be administered only for excused absences. Written email requests for makeup assignments must be made within one week after the missed quiz or exam.
Academic Integrity
Students are expected to be familiar with, and adhere to, University policies on Academic Dishonesty. Dishonesty of any kind will not be tolerated in this course. Dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarizing, fabricating information or citations, facilitating acts of academic dishonesty by others, having unauthorized possession of examinations, submitting work of another person or work previously used without informing the instructor, or tampering with the academic work of other students. Students who are found to be dishonest may receive a failing grade on the assignment and/or in the course. The Dean of Students Office, Judicial Affairs, has produced a guide on how to avoid plagiarism, which can be accessed at http://www.fullerton.edu/deanofstudents/judicial/Plagiarism.htm.
Use of Blackboard
Since this is an online course, the use of a computer and the Internet is required. You will be utilizing Blackboard for quizzes and writing assignments, correspondence with the instructor, and posting of grades. The syllabus is available on Blackboard where all the course information and activities required for your grade will be posted during the semester. Blackboard is a web-based application provided by CSUF on which instructors can provide course documents and resources to students. If you have difficulties using your computer or getting access to Blackboard, contact the Helpdesk at http://www.fullerton.edu/helpdesk, or (714) 278-7777 but do NOT call me or the Anthropology Department. Please make sure that the e-mail address listed for you on Blackboard is the one you use (all CSUF students receive a student e-mail address, but you may have it changed to another one you use, such as gmail or yahoo; remember that it is your responsibility to arrange this; please do not use inappropriate email names). Your not receiving e-mail because of not having verified your correct e-mail address is your responsibility; it may not be used as an excuse for missing assignments. If you are unfamiliar with Blackboard tools, there are several tutorials (http://distance-ed.fullerton.edu/bb/) that are offered through Blackboard and I encourage you to use them. You are responsible for learning how to use Blackboard. For a tutorial or access to the Blackboard Support Web Site, you can also click on “Need Help?” which you will find once you’ve clicked the Blackboard tab. Students access Blackboard through their Student Portal. Login to the portal at http://my.fullerton.edu; click the Blackboard tab; click the link ‘Click here to Access your Blackboard Classes’.
Other Online Course Information
• I will respond to student email within 48 hours.
• I will post grades for the previous week’s assignments on the class Blackboard site one week after the due date, although there may be delays due to workload.
• All posts and emails must be signed with your real name.
• You need to be familiar with Windows and the use of a keyboard and mouse.
• You will need access to a Windows based computer connected to the internet. There are many such computers available on campus.
• In the event of technical problems, students can submit their work to my department office (MH-426H) or a Department of Anthropology staff during regular university business hours.
Netiquette
Please observe standards of etiquette on the web. Although this is an online environment, it is still in an educational and classroom format. Treat your postings and discussions in a professional and educational manner. It is not appropriate to discuss extracurricular activities that are irrelevant to course and content and class discussions. If you do feel the need to have such discussions, please utilize another internet resource such as AOL, Yahoo, or Gmail. Your postings on Blackboard are NOT private discussions and I will be monitoring them for content and for grading purposes. Disruptive behavior online will not be tolerated, and I will block you from participating (which will affect your grade). Be respectful and courteous to members of the class (including your professor). Do not use all capital letters in your posts, and avoid personal comments.
Basic Rules for Postings and Discussions:
• BE sure to identify yourself
• BE polite
• BE sure to identify quoted material
• NO long posts - 50 line limit
• NO obscene language
• NO religious or sexual solicitation
• NO personal attacks on list members
• NO long ASCII graphics
• NO long quotations
• Do your own work
Undergraduate Student Grading
The percentage breakdown is as follows:
Quizzes (5) 15%
Problems (4) 20%
Exam 1 20%
Exam 2 20%
Final Exam 25%
Total: 100%
Graduate Student Grading
The percentage breakdown is as follows:
Quizzes (5) 15%
Problems (4) 15%
Research Paper 20%
Exam 1 15%
Exam 2 15%
Final Exam 20%
Total: 100%
Grading System
Grade Points Percentages
A Outstanding 4.0 92.5 to 100%
A- 3.7 90 to 92.49%
B+ 3.3 87.5 to 89.99%
B Good 3.0 82.5 to 87.49%
B- 2.7 80 to 82.49%
C+ 2.3 77.5 to 79.99%
C Acceptable 2.0 72.5 to 77.49%
C- 1.7 70 to 72.49%
D+ 1.3 67.5 to 69.99%
D Poor 1.0 62.5 to 67.49%
D- 0.7 60 to 62.49%
F Failing 0.0 0 to 59.99%
Grades of ‘A’ are earned by students who make a serious effort on their assignments and in the class in general (e.g., discussions), and who demonstrate by their work and exams that they have an excellent understanding of the materials covered in lectures and readings.
Note: Reading assignments are to be completed by the beginning of the week. Be aware that there are a series of great maps at the back of Ancient Mexico and Central America.
REQ = Readings required for all students
GS = Graduate Student required reading
SR = Supplemental reading (not required for Undergraduate or Graduate Students)
WEEK |
Module/Lesson |
TOPIC(S) |
ACTIVITIES |
READING ASSIGNMENTS |
|
1
(July 7 – July12) |
1 |
Introduction to Mesoamerica: geography, culture traits |
Video Clip: “Fall of the Maya & Aztec Empires” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 16-61 SR-Kirchhoff (1952) |
|
2 |
The Paleoindian and Archaic Periods: Mexico before 2000 B.C.: The peopling of Mexico. Valsequillo, Tlapacoya, Tepexpan, Sta. Isabel Iztapan. |
Video Clip: “Out of the Past: New Worlds” Video Clip: “Mystery of the First Americans” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 61-88 SR-Aveleyra Arroyo De Anda (1956) SR-Irwin-Williams (1978) SR-Mirambell (n.d.) |
|
|
3 |
The Archaic Period and Begin the Formative Period: Tamaulipas, Tehuacan, Oaxaca; Origins of corn and new controversies; earliest pottery, Pox, Purron, Barra |
Quiz 1 (due July 12) Problem 1 (due July 12) Video Clip: “Corn and the Origin of Settled Life in Mesoamerica” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 88-98 REQ-MacNeish (1964) SR-Beadle (1980) SR-Brush (1965) REQ-Clark and Gosser (1995)
|
|
|
2
(July 13 – July19) |
4 |
The Formative ("Preclassic") Period: Earliest settled villages and developing complexity on the Pacific coast of Chiapas and the Valley of Oaxaca |
Video Clip: “Out of the Past: The Hearth” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 99-126 REQ-Flannery (1976) SR-Flannery and Marcus (1976) SR-Flannery and Winter (1976) SR-Clark (1991) |
|
5 |
The Early Formative Period – The Gulf Coast Olmec: San Lorenzo, El Manatí |
Video Clip: “Kings of the Stone Age” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 128-144 REQ-Cyphers (1996) SR-Grove (1997) SR-Wendt (2005) |
|
|
6 |
The Middle Formative Period – The Gulf Coast Olmec: La Venta, Laguna de los Cerros, Llano del Jicaro |
Quiz 2 (due July 19) Exam 1 (due July 19) Video Clip: “Excavations at La Venta” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 174-179 REQ-Gonzalez Lauck (1996) SR-Grove (1981) |
|
|
3
(July 20 – July26) |
7 |
The Early and Middle Formative Period in Central and Western Mexico: Tlatilco Culture, Tlapacoya, Coapacco, Chalcatzingo, Teopantecuanitlan, Gurrero Formative |
|
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 145-174 REQ-Grove (2000:137-148) SR-Weigand (2000)
|
|
8 |
The Late Formative: Izapa, Tres Zapotes, the West Mexican Formative, Chupicuaro, Cuicuilco, the emergence of Teotihuacan |
|
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 185-201, 205-227, 245-260 REQ-Pool (2000) SR-Grove (2000: 148-151)
|
|
|
9 |
The Classic Period (Part 1): Urbanism, the state, and Teotihuacan |
Quiz 3 (due July 26) Problem 2 (due July 26) Graduate Students’ Research Paper Topic (due July 26) Video Clip: “Teotihuacan: The City of the Gods” Video Clip: “Out of the Past: The Hearth” Video Clip: “Sentinels in Silence” Video Clip: “Teotihuacan: The Multicultural Jewel of Mesoamerica” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 262-275 SR-Heyden (1981) REQ-Cowgill (1997) SR-Millon (1981) |
|
|
4
(July 27 – Aug 2) |
10 |
The Classic Period (Part 2): Teotihuacan's collapse, Oaxaca
|
Video Clip: “Teotihuacan: El Caracol Alado” Video Clip: “Out of the Past: Teotihuacan” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 275-289 REQ-Blanton et al. (1999) GS-Manzanilla (1996) SR-Cowgill (2000), pp. 250-289
|
|
11 |
The Classic Period (Part 3): Oaxaca, Classic Veracruz, Matacapan |
|
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 239-244, 289-290, 373-376, 397 SR-Marcus and Flannery (2000) GS-Marcus (1980) |
|
|
12 |
The Classic and Epi-Classic Periods: El Tajin, Huaxteca, Cholula, Xochicalco, Cacaxtla, Western and Northern Mexico |
Quiz 4 (due Aug 2) Problem 3 (due Aug 2) Exam 2 (due Aug 2) Graduate Students’ Research Paper Outline and Preliminary Bibliography Due Aug 2 Video Clip: “Xochicalco” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 349-373 SR-Marcus (1989) GS-Cowgill (2000), pp. 289-304
|
|
|
5
(Aug. 3 - Aug 7) |
13 |
The Epi-Classic and Early Postclassic Periods: Tollan, Tula, and Toltecs: separating fantasy from facts |
|
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 399-422 GS-Healan (1977)
|
|
14 |
The Postclassic Period and the Rise of the Aztecs |
Video Clip: “The Aztecs” Video Clip: “Out of the Past: Realms” Video Clip: “Chinampas” Video Clip: “Aztecs” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 424-468 SR-Smith (2003:28-55) SR-Pollard (2000) |
|
|
15 |
The Postclassic Period and the Fall of the Aztecs
|
Quiz 5 (due Aug 7) Problem 4 (due Aug 7) Graduate Student Term Paper (due Aug 7) Video Clip: “The Conquest of Mexico” Video Clip: “Out of the Past: Collapse” |
REQ-Evans (2008), pp. 469-512, 521-549 SR-Smith (2003:268-293) SR-Smith and Hodge (1994)
|
|
|
Aug. 8 |
|
Final Exam |
Final Exam |
|
This document is not a legal contract, but a course syllabus. As such, it is a good-faith outline of course requirements and expectations. Note, however, that circumstances may require that assignment deadlines and so on be changed during the course of the semester. Changes, if any, will be announced in class, so attendance at class meetings is important and expected. It is your responsibility to know of any announced changes even if you are absent.
List of Additional Readings (by module / lesson)
Module / Lesson 1
Kirchhoff, P.
1952 Mesoamerica: Its Geographic Limits, Ethnic Composition and Cultural Characteristics. In Heritage of Conquest: The Ethnology of Middle America, edited by Sol Tax, pp. 17-39. The Free Press Publishers, Glancoe, IL.
Module / Lesson 2
Aveleyra Arroyo De Anda, Luis
1956 Second Mammoth and Associated Artifacts at Santa Isabel Iztapan. American Antiquity 22(1):12-28.
Irwin-Williams, Cynthia Cora
1978 Summary of Archaeological Evidence from the Valsequillo Region, Puebla, Mexico. In Cultural Continuity in Mesoamerica. The Hague: Mouton.
Mirambell, Lorena
n.d. Tlapacoya: A Late Pleistocene Site in Central Mexico.
Module / Lesson 3
MacNeish, Richard S.
1964 The Origins of New World Civilization. Scientific American 211(5):29-37.
Beadle, George W.
1980 Ancestry of corn. Scientific American 242(1):112-119.
Brush, Charles F.
1965 Pox Pottery: Earliest Identified Mexican Ceramic. Science 149(3680):194-195.
Clark, John E. and Dennis Gosser
1995 Reinventing Mesoamerica’s First Pottery. In The Emergence of Pottery: Technology and Innovation in Ancient Societies, edited by W. Barnett and J. Hoopes, pp.209‑222. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Module / Lesson 4
Flannery, Kent V.
1976 The Early Mesoamerican House. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by Kent V. Flannery, pp. 16-24. Academic Press, New York.
Flannery, Kent V. and Joyce Marcus
1976 Formative Oaxaca and the Zapotec Cosmos. American Scientist 64(4):374-383.
Flannery, Kent V. and Marcus C. Winter
1976 Analyzing Household Activities. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by Kent V. Flannery, pp. 34-45. Academic Press, New York.
Clark, John E.
1991 The Beginnings of Mesoamerica: Apologia for the Soconusco Early Formative. In The Formation of Complex Society in Southeastern Mesoamerica, edited by W. R. Fowler, Jr., pp. 13-26. CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Module / Lesson 5
Cyphers, Ann
1996 Reconstructing Olmec Life at San Lorenzo. In Olmec Art of Ancient Mexico, edited by Elizabeth P. Benson and Beatrice de la Fuente, pp. 61-71. National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC.
Grove, David C.
1997 Olmec Archaeology: A Half Century of Research and Its Accomplishments. Journal of World Archaeology 11(1):51-101.
Wendt, Carl J.
2005 Excavations at El Remolino: Household Archaeology in the San Lorenzo Olmec Region. Journal of Field Archaeology 30:163-180.
Module / Lesson 6
González Lauck, Rebecca
1996 La Venta: An Olmec Capital. In Olmec Art of Ancient Mexico, edited by Elizabeth P. Benson and Beatrice de la Fuente, pp. 73-81. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.
Grove, David C.
1981 Olmec Monuments: Mutilation as a Clue to Meaning. In The Olmec and Their Neighbors, edited by Elizabeth P. Benson, pp. 49-68. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington.
Module / Lesson 7
Grove, David C.
2000 The Preclassic Societies of the Central Highlands of Mesoamerica. In The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Volume II, Part I 1996-2000, edited by Richard E. W. Adams and Murdo J. MacLeod, pp. 122-155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Weigand, Phil C.
2000 The Evolution and Decline of a Core Civilization: The Teuchitlan Tradition and the Archaeology of Jalisco. In Greater Mesoamerica: The Archaeology of West and Northwest Mexico, edited by M. S. Foster, Shirley Gorenstein, pp. 4358. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Module / Lesson 8
Pool, Christopher A.
2000 From Olmec to Epi-Olmec at Tres Zapotes. In Olmec Art and Archaeology in Mesoamerica, edited by John E. Clark and Mary E. Pye, pp. 137-153. National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC.
Grove, David C.
2000 The Preclassic Societies of the Central Highlands of Mesoamerica. In The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Volume II, Part I 1996-2000, edited by Richard E. W. Adams and Murdo J. MacLeod, pp. 122-155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Module / Lesson 9
Heyden, Doris
1981 Caves, Gods, and Myths: World-View and Planning in Teotihuacan. In Mesoamerican Sites and World-Views, edited by Elizabeth P. Benson, pp. 1-40. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, DC.
Cowgill, G. L.
1997 State and Society at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Annual Review of Anthropology 26:129-161.
Millón, René F.
1981 Teotihuacan: City, State, and Civilization. In Archaeology, edited by Jeremy A. Sabloff, pp. 198-243. Handbook of Middle American Indians, Supplement 1, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Module / Lesson 10
Blanton, R. E., Gary M. Feinman, Stephen A. Kowalewski, Linda M. Nicholas
1999 Chapter 3. The Origins of Monte Alban. Ancient Oaxaca. Case Studies in Early Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 48-67.
Cowgill, G. L.
2000 The Central Mexican Highlands from the Rise of Teotihuacan to the Decline of Tula. In The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Volume II, Part I, edited by Richard E. W. Adams and Murdo J. MacLeod, pp. 250-317. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Manzanilla, Linda
1996 Corporate Groups and Domestic Activities at Teotihuacan. Latin American Antiquity 7(3):228-246.
Module / Lesson 11
Marcus, Joyce, and Kent V. Flannery
2000 Cultural Evolution in Oaxaca: The Origins of the Zapotec and Mixtec Civilizations. In The Cambridge history of the native peoples of the Americas. Volume II, Part I 1996-2000, edited by Richard E. W. Adams and Murdo J. MacLeod, pp. 358-406. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Marcus, Joyce
1980 Zapotec Writing. Scientific American Feb.:46-60.
Module / Lesson 12
Marcus, J.
1989 From centralized systems to city-states: possible models for the Epiclassic. In Mesoamerica after the decline of Teotihuacan: A.D. 700-900, edited by R. Diehl and J. Berlo, pp. 201-208. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington D.C.
Cowgill, G. L.
2000 The Central Mexican Highlands from the Rise of Teotihuacan to the Decline of Tula. In The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Volume II, Part I, edited by Richard E. W. Adams and Murdo J. MacLeod, pp. 250-317. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Module / Lesson 13
Healan, Dan M.
1977 Architectural Implications of Daily Life in Ancient Tollán, Hidalgo, México. World Archaeology 9(2):140-156.
Module / Lesson 14
Smith, M. E.
2003 The Rise of Aztec Civilization. In The Aztecs, pp. 28-55. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Pollard, H. P.
2000 Tarascans and Their Ancestors: Prehistory of Michoacan. In Greater Mesoamerica: The Archaeology of West and Northwest Mexico, edited by M. S. Foster, Shirley Gorenstein, pp. 59-70. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Module / Lesson 15
Smith, M. E.
2003 Final Glory and Destruction. In The Aztecs, pp. 268-293. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Smith, Michael E., and Mary D. Hodge,
1994 An introduction to Late Postclassic economies and polities. In Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, edited by M. Hodge and M. Smith, pp. 1-42. Studies on Culture and Society, 6, State University of New York at Albany, Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, Albany.
Download syllabus Microsoft Word (.doc) file. If you do not have Word, please use the Word Viewer.